After eight years of marriage
The first time I visited my parents,
They asked, “Are you happy, tell us”.
It was an absurd question
And I should have laughed at it
Instead, I cried,
And in between sobs, nodded yes.
I wanted to tell them
That I was happy on Tuesday
I was unhappy on Wednesday.
I was happy one day at 8 o'clock
I was most unhappy by 8.15.
I wanted to tell them how one day
We all ate a watermelon and laughed.
I wanted to tell them how I wept in
bed all night once
And struggled hard from hurting
myself.
That it wasn't easy to be happy in a
family of twelve,
But they were looking at my two sons,
Hopping around like young goats.
Their wrinkled hands, beaten faces
and grey eyelashes
Were all too much too real.
SO I swallowed everything,
And smiled a smile of great content.
Confessional poems are straight from the heart and talks
mainly about the issues that encircles the poet’s life or state of mind. Here
the poet wilfully speaks out his/her conflicts and demons with or without the
help of a figment of fiction.
Mamta Kalia is a poet from Mathura and writes in both
English and Hindi. Her poems revolve around relationship, complexities of her
own life, and personal experiences. Her poems portray her life and gives a
context to her relationship with other people in her life.
This poem vividly essays the discontent state of a married
woman. The married woman acts like the poet’s prop in enlightening the details
of poet’s life to the reader.
“After eight years of marriage, the first time I visited my
parents” – says how that woman is caged and cultured to be in her marital home.
The wings are clipped and the movement is restricted. Nevertheless, she visits
and the first question crops up is very emotional. The woman is certainly not
happy with this question and tries to bring humour by saying “And I should have
laughed at it”. But again, the question doesn’t sit comfortably in her mind
leading her to breakdown with tears. The tears only stay in the corner of her
soulful eyes. Like her, they have grown a steely spine over the years, not to
stream down her cheeks, but only standing and watching the world from distance.
The thoughts, however, gathered and she wanted to tell her parents, share her
life stories with them.
She skilfully atomizes her state of mind one day at a time.
The following lines in the poem will tell you that.
“I was happy one day at 8 o clock.
I was most unhappy by 8.15”
The truth about human mind and its tendency to change
according to the environment and external aspects is made clear.
And sometimes, the sorrows were so deep and so damaging that
she wept all night. Now this shows how lofty hearted woman are. However unhappy
they are, they will not breakdown in front of their loved ones. Only the
pillows stand as witness. “I wanted to tell them how I wept in bed all night
once”
The married woman is in a joint family where there are
cultural distinctions, disparity in world views and values. They are
overwhelming for her but she is expected to adapt to this situation and move on
with this kind of life. The first time in her parent’s house makes her want to
pour down her feelings, the bottled up
emotions, but she purses her lips,
swallows them like a bitter medicine and smiles to avoid springing distress at
her parents.
The parents look at the woman’s children who were full of
life and rhythm. Like two young goats. The reality dawns on her. She swallows
the clouds and pictures a bright, clear sky in front of parents. Seeing her
contented smile and her two cherubs, they heave a sigh of relief. The poem
pictures a balance of grief and joy, felt in the depth of the woman’s heart.
The fluctuating feelings of anxiety, pain, happiness and satisfaction, is what
human feels be it in a joint family or a nuclear family. We can hardly say a
person is bereft of happiness completely or he/she is bereft of sorrows in
life. Extreme happiness is utopian world and, in a way, extreme distress or
pain can mean a dystopian view. They both are a state of mind and cannot
always, make a home in a person’s mind. So, this married woman in the poem also
feels the same thing in her marital life, with spouse, children and her
extended family.
However, if we see those last few mines in different light,
the poem can mean a disillusioned sense of a society. A poem can also determine
a stereotypical frame of mind which existed in distant past and is still in
existence, maybe in not a better-ordered world around you, but in hinterlands
or a conservative family setup. Taking that cue ahead, let’s delve further. The
last few lines give us a picture of parents of the woman smiling in
satisfaction after looking at her sons. The parents endorse the stereotype
which is the science between happy marriage and children. The bun in the oven
signals a happy marriage. And a balm to withering marriage is always a child.
Child will rescue two souls and bring life to the dead equation. Somehow
society buys this concept and the generations inherited this thought blindly.
In contrast, a child
in an unhappy marriage will never mend the agony but will put an enormous
pressure to already burdened woman’s life. And the thought developing in a
woman’s mind to escape out of this unhappy marriage will not be welcomed by the
society. The questions and opinions like “How can a mother leave out of her
marriage and breakdown the family? She should have at least thought about her
child” will always cloud her, obstruct her way, pushing her into an abyss where
no hands can reach her and would not want to reach to pull her up. This is only
a way of gaslighting a woman. A tale woven by unemployed society who cared two
hoots to the relationship and mental sanity of a woman. A relationship that is
unsalvageable cannot be salvaged by a child. We need to grow out of this distorted
worldview and change the narrative. Resolve and mend the relationship before
you even strike a conversation of bringing another human into your marriage. Do
not put a burden on a child to do that for you.
Comments
Post a Comment